Updated 2026-09-22
Delaware call recording law
Delaware is a contested — treat as all-party state under Del. Code tit. 11 § 2402; tit. 11 § 1335.
The wiretap statute reads as one-party, while the privacy statute has been read to require all-party consent.
Worth knowing
Treat Delaware as all-party. The safe reading is the stricter one.
What this means for a law firm
You cannot record an incoming call in Delaware on your own consent alone. The caller has to be told, and the telling has to happen before anything worth recording is said.
In practice this means a spoken notice in the first sentence — not a line in a privacy policy the caller has never read, and not a beep. Several all-party statutes, Washington’s most plainly, treat a recorded announcement at the start of the call as the consent mechanism.
The interstate problem is the real one. A firm in Delaware takes calls from outside Delaware, and courts have applied the stricter state’s rule in that situation. Announcing the recording on every call removes the question rather than answering it.
How ClerkBird handles it
ClerkBird opens every call with the same sentence, before it asks anything: “Thanks for calling [firm]. I’m an AI assistant, and this call is recorded. How can I help you today?”
That line is enforced in code. It is not a setting, and a firm cannot edit it out — which is the point: a disclosure that any customer can disable is not a compliance control. It also covers the second obligation, bot disclosure, which California and other states impose independently of recording law.
Firms that would rather not hold audio at all can set retention to zero, and ClerkBird keeps only the transcript.
Other contested — treat as all-party states
This page is a reference, not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for reading Del. Code tit. 11 § 2402; tit. 11 § 1335. Statutes are amended and courts reinterpret them. Confirm the current rule with counsel licensed in Delaware before relying on it.